Skip to content

PAIRING · MEASURED SIDE BY SIDE

Lumos vs Okta Identity Governance: reach beyond the IdP and IGA

The short answer

On our default weights Lumos scores higher overall, 6.13 against 5.10 out of 10. Lumos scores higher on Unmanaged app discovery, Accounts inside the app, Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM and Orchestrates through the existing stack; Okta scores higher on Machine, service and agent accounts and Pricing transparency. They tie on Executes changes itself and Audit evidence. They sit in different layers (Identity governance (IGA) platform and Governance add-on to an identity provider), so many teams run both.

By The Credential Desk · IAM Compared · Published 2026-10-08

Desk research from public vendor pages and documentation read in September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.

How do they score on each criterion?

Criterion scores out of 10 on default weights. Higher is computed per criterion.
CriterionWeightLumosOktaHigher
Unmanaged app discovery18%6.0

Identity Analytics surfaces shadow IT alongside dormant and over-privileged accounts.

3.0

Not described on the pages reviewed for applications: discovery of apps nobody connected to Okta is not described. ISPM scans environments for shadow AI agents and their connections.

Lumos
Accounts inside the app16%6.2

Surfaces dormant accounts and revokes local accounts; app-native role mapping is not detailed.

5.0

Entitlements give fine-grained control over what a user can do within an application, and downstream permissions are updated or revoked when a role changes; discovery of local, orphaned or dormant accounts inside apps is not described on the pages reviewed.

Lumos
Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM14%5.0

Revocation described across custom and on-prem apps; handling of apps with no API is not detailed.

3.0

Not described on the pages reviewed. Reach into applications without an API, connector or SCIM endpoint is not described; onboarding and offboarding run between directories and cloud applications.

Lumos
Orchestrates through the existing stack14%7.0

Works across the IdP, HRIS, SaaS and cloud stack already in place, with 300+ integrations.

5.0

A governance product inside the Okta identity platform; requests run through a self-service portal, Slack or Teams. Feeding findings into another IGA, PAM or ITSM tool is not described on the pages reviewed.

Lumos
Executes changes itself12%8.0

HRIS-triggered joiner, mover and leaver workflows; leavers offboarded with licenses reclaimed.

8.0

Automates user onboarding and offboarding between directories and cloud applications, and updates or revokes downstream permissions when a role changes.

Tie
Machine, service and agent accounts10%6.0

MCP Governance records agent tool calls with the human identity and policy decision; service account coverage is not detailed.

8.0

Okta for AI Agents tracks each agent, verifies ownership, governs access and shuts down rogue actions; ISPM surfaces shadow agents into a central directory; Cross App Access issues ephemeral, scoped tokens for tool calls. Service accounts and hardcoded credentials are not described.

Okta
Audit evidence10%7.0

Full audit trail of every grant and revocation.

7.0

Auditable records of access approvals and scheduled access certifications presented as evidence for auditors; a framework-mapped evidence export is not described.

Tie
Pricing transparency6%2.0

No published prices.

3.0

No price on the Identity Governance page. The Okta pricing page lists Workforce Identity suites per user, with Identity Governance priced on inquiry.

Okta
Total100%6.135.10Lumos

What shape is each tool's reach?

LumosRank 7 of 9RANK 07 OF 09 · REACH SCORE · 7
Lumos reach rosetteUnmanaged app discovery 6.0 of 10, Accounts inside the app 6.2 of 10, Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM 5.0 of 10, Orchestrates through the existing stack 7.0 of 10, Executes changes itself 8.0 of 10, Machine, service and agent accounts 6.0 of 10, Audit evidence 7.0 of 10, Pricing transparency 2.0 of 106.13DISCINAPPNOAPIORCHEXECNHIEVIDPRICE
DISC
Unmanaged app discovery
6.0
INAPP
Accounts inside the app
6.2
NOAPI
Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM
5.0
ORCH
Orchestrates through the existing stack
7.0
EXEC
Executes changes itself
8.0
NHI
Machine, service and agent accounts
6.0
EVID
Audit evidence
7.0
PRICE
Pricing transparency
2.0

Each sector is one criterion. The longer the engraved sector, the higher the editorial score. Sectors are equal width, so the picture shows the shape of a tool's reach, not its weighted total.

Okta Identity GovernanceRank 8 of 9RANK 08 OF 09 · REACH SCORE · 8
Okta Identity Governance reach rosetteUnmanaged app discovery 3.0 of 10, Accounts inside the app 5.0 of 10, Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM 3.0 of 10, Orchestrates through the existing stack 5.0 of 10, Executes changes itself 8.0 of 10, Machine, service and agent accounts 8.0 of 10, Audit evidence 7.0 of 10, Pricing transparency 3.0 of 105.10DISCINAPPNOAPIORCHEXECNHIEVIDPRICE
DISC
Unmanaged app discovery
3.0
INAPP
Accounts inside the app
5.0
NOAPI
Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM
3.0
ORCH
Orchestrates through the existing stack
5.0
EXEC
Executes changes itself
8.0
NHI
Machine, service and agent accounts
8.0
EVID
Audit evidence
7.0
PRICE
Pricing transparency
3.0

Each sector is one criterion. The longer the engraved sector, the higher the editorial score. Sectors are equal width, so the picture shows the shape of a tool's reach, not its weighted total.

Which parts of the estate does each document?

As documented on each vendor's own pages.
ZoneLumosOkta
Unsanctioned SaaSPartial

Shadow IT surfaced in Identity Analytics

Not documented

Discovery of unconnected SaaS not described

On-prem and legacy appsPartial

Revocation across on-prem systems

Not documented

On-prem and legacy apps not described

Custom-built appsPartial

Revocation across custom apps

Not documented

Custom-built apps not described

Local accounts in appsPartial

Revocation across local accounts; dormant accounts surfaced

Not documented

Local or orphaned accounts inside apps not described

Service accounts and hardcoded credentialsNot documented

Not described on the pages reviewed

Not documented

Service accounts and hardcoded credentials not described

AI agentsPartial

MCP Governance for agent tool calls

Documented

Okta for AI Agents and shadow agent scanning in ISPM

What do they cost?

Lumos

Pricing

Not published

Deployment

SaaS.

Okta Identity Governance

Pricing

Not published

No price on the Identity Governance page. Workforce Identity suites listed from $6 to $17 per user per month; Identity Governance priced on inquiry, with a $1,500 annual minimum.

Source: Okta pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Deployment

Part of the Okta identity platform.

Which should you choose?

Choose Lumos if

  • you want to keep your current IdP, IGA and ticketing tools and feed them
  • you need to see local, orphaned and dormant accounts inside each app

Choose Okta if

  • service accounts, workload identities and AI agents are in scope
  • you need a published price before talking to sales

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher overall, Lumos or Okta Identity Governance?

On our default weights Lumos scores higher overall, 6.13 against 5.10 out of 10.

Where does Lumos score higher than Okta Identity Governance?

Lumos scores higher on Unmanaged app discovery (6.0 against 3.0), Accounts inside the app (6.2 against 5.0), Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM (5.0 against 3.0) and Orchestrates through the existing stack (7.0 against 5.0).

Can Lumos and Okta Identity Governance be used together?

Often, yes. They sit in different layers (Identity governance (IGA) platform; Governance add-on to an identity provider), and each one's pages describe working with existing identity tools.