TOOL PROFILE · IDENTITY GOVERNANCE (IGA) PLATFORM
C1 review 2026: shadow app detection and open connectors
The short answer
C1 ranks 3 of 8 at 6.30 out of 10. It monitors shadow app sign-ups and logins to decide what to bring under governance, and its open-source Baton connectors and C1 Bridge give a documented route into custom and on-prem systems. Apps with no connector are not described in detail, and it publishes a pricing structure without prices.
By The Credential Desk · IAM Compared · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages and documentation read in September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Rank 3 of 8 on default weights
Shadow app detection and open-source connectors
Change the weights in the coverage gap calculatorWhat shape is C1's reach?
- DISC
- Unmanaged app discovery
- 6.0
- INAPP
- Accounts inside the app
- 6.0
- NOAPI
- Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM
- 6.5
- ORCH
- Orchestrates through the existing stack
- 7.0
- EXEC
- Executes changes itself
- 7.8
- NHI
- Machine, service and agent accounts
- 6.0
- EVID
- Audit evidence
- 6.5
- PRICE
- Pricing transparency
- 3.0
Each sector is one criterion. The longer the engraved sector, the higher the editorial score. Sectors are equal width, so the picture shows the shape of a tool's reach, not its weighted total.
What does C1 do?
Identity governance with JML automation, access reviews, shadow app detection and open-source Baton connectors.
- Name
- conductorone.com redirects to c1.ai.
Source: conductorone.com (redirects to c1.ai) · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Shadow IT
- "Monitor shadow app signups and logins to determine whether to bring an app under governance".
Source: C1: Shadow IT · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Connectors
- C1 Connectors and open-source Baton connectors; C1 Bridge for on-prem systems; Shadow AI Discovery.
Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Lifecycle
- HR-triggered workflows; "Find what offboarding missed"; records each action.
Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026
- EU instance
- Tenant data held in the EU, on AWS Frankfurt with Ireland for disaster recovery (15 September 2026).
Source: C1 blog: C1 now available in Europe · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Autonomous Worker
- An agent that runs tasks such as revoking unused admin access and building access reviews with the operator's own permissions (15 June 2026).
Source: C1 blog: C1 Autonomous Worker · Read 27 Sep 2026
What does C1 state about itself?
We did not collect a headline figure or finding from C1 (formerly ConductorOne) for this page.
Which parts of the estate does C1 document?
- Unsanctioned SaaSPartial
Shadow app sign-up and login monitoring
Source: C1: Shadow IT · Read 27 Sep 2026
- On-prem and legacy appsDocumented
C1 Bridge for on-prem systems
Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Custom-built appsPartial
Open-source Baton connectors you can extend
Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Local accounts in appsPartial
Find what offboarding missed
Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026
- Service accounts and hardcoded credentialsNot documented
Not described on the pages reviewed
- AI agentsPartial
Shadow AI Discovery listed
Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026
How does C1 score on each criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Why | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unmanaged app discovery | 18% | 6.0 / 10 | Monitors shadow app sign-ups and logins to decide whether to bring an app under governance, and lists Shadow AI Discovery. | Source: C1: Shadow IT · Read 27 Sep 2026 · Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Accounts inside the app | 16% | 6.0 / 10 | Finds what offboarding missed; mapping of local accounts inside apps is not detailed. | Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM | 14% | 6.5 / 10 | Open-source Baton connectors and C1 Bridge for on-prem systems; apps with no connector are not described in detail. | Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Orchestrates through the existing stack | 14% | 7.0 / 10 | Connects to existing IdPs and HR systems rather than replacing them. | Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Executes changes itself | 12% | 7.8 / 10 | HR systems and directories trigger join, role change and departure workflows. | Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Machine, service and agent accounts | 10% | 6.0 / 10 | Shadow AI Discovery is listed; service account and credential coverage is not detailed. | Source: C1 homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Audit evidence | 10% | 6.5 / 10 Tied lowest | Records each offboarding action; a framework evidence export is not described. | Source: C1 Lifecycle · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Pricing transparency | 6% | 3.0 / 10 | Publishes the pricing structure but no prices. | Source: C1 pricing · Read 12 Oct 2026 |
Where does C1 lead, and where does it trail?
Leads or ties the set on
It does not lead any criterion; its highest scores are Executes changes itself and Orchestrates through the existing stack.
Trails the leader on
- Pricing transparency: 3.0 against Entra ID Governance at 9.5
- Unmanaged app discovery: 6.0 against Orchid at 9.5
- Accounts inside the app: 6.0 against Orchid at 9.0
- Reach into apps without APIs or SCIM: 6.5 against Orchid at 9.0
Strengths on its public pages
- Watches shadow app sign-ups and logins to decide what to bring under governance.
- Open-source Baton connectors and C1 Bridge give a documented route into custom and on-prem systems.
Limits on its public pages
- Handling of apps with no connector at all is not described in detail.
- Publishes its pricing structure but no prices.
What does C1 cost, and how is it deployed?
Pricing
Pricing structure published (Platform or Flex; Pro or Advanced; 100 to 20,000 managed identities) without prices.
Source: C1 pricing · Read 12 Oct 2026
Deployment
SaaS with hosted or on-prem connectors (C1 Bridge). EU instance with tenant data held in the EU since September 2026.
Who is C1 for?
Teams that want governance plus shadow app detection, and engineers who will extend open-source connectors.
Consider instead if you need a published price before talking to sales: Microsoft Entra ID Governance.
How does C1 compare with each other tool?
- C1 vs Orchid
Orchid Security scores higher overall, 8.24 against 6.30
- C1 vs Veza
Veza scores higher overall, 6.37 against 6.30
- C1 vs Saviynt
C1 (formerly ConductorOne) scores higher overall, 6.30 against 6.15
- C1 vs SailPoint
C1 (formerly ConductorOne) scores higher overall, 6.30 against 6.21
- C1 vs Entra ID Governance
C1 (formerly ConductorOne) scores higher overall, 6.30 against 6.15
- C1 vs Lumos
C1 (formerly ConductorOne) scores higher overall, 6.30 against 6.13
- C1 vs Apono
C1 (formerly ConductorOne) scores higher overall, 6.30 against 4.78
Learn more
LESSON 01
The unmanaged application estate: what your identity provider missesThree kinds of unmanaged app, where they come from and why they matter.
LESSON 07
How identity tools reach applications without APIs or SCIMSeven ways to get account data in and out of a hard application.
Frequently asked questions
What is C1 (formerly ConductorOne)?
Identity governance with JML automation, access reviews, shadow app detection and open-source Baton connectors. It sits in the identity governance (iga) platform layer.
How does C1 (formerly ConductorOne) score on reach beyond the IdP?
6.30 out of 10, rank 3 of 8 on default weights. Its highest criterion scores are Executes changes itself (7.8) and Orchestrates through the existing stack (7.0) and its lowest is Pricing transparency (3.0).
What are the alternatives to C1 (formerly ConductorOne)?
On our reach score the closest alternatives are Orchid Security, Veza and SailPoint Identity Security Cloud. The moving-off page lists every alternative and the criteria where each scores higher.
Read next
- IAM rankings
All 8 tools on default weights
- Set side by side
C1 against up to four others
- Coverage gap calculator
Re-weight the ranking
- Moving off C1
Alternatives ranked